Google essentially halted processing defamation takedown requests, even when accompanied by duly executed court orders specifying URLs containing Shadow Making defamatory content. I learned this from interviewing a number of attorneys across the United States who specialize in defamation cases and using court orders establishing content as defamatory as a way to get Google to remove URLs from their search results. For perhaps a decade now, this Shadow Making process has brought relief to people who had little other options for removing harmful and false representations about themselves from prominent visibility. According to attorneys I interviewed (some of whom showed me communications directly from Google), at the time Google largely suspended all new takedown requests.
Some websites are outside the jurisdiction of the United States and simply ignore you. Other sites, like Ripoff Report, choose to do nothing because US Shadow Making law does not require it. And Google can decide whether or not to remove the URLs. You may have spent tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars for relief at this point, only to Shadow Making be declined by Google without receiving any explanation. As I explained in the previous article, it can be seen why.
Google must clearly indicate the criteria on which it will base its decisions. As one defamation lawyer told Google, individuals can lose their businesses, careers, and ultimately their lives to online reputation attacks. Yes, there are legitimate free speech issues Shadow Making that sometimes come into play, as well as the previously mentioned fraud against the courts, but the little guys with far fewer resources are the victims of outsiders who need Shadow Making lawyers in this case. US laws that allow many websites to distribute content without liability to remove defamation – particularly Section 230 of the.